Embedded Files
"On May 17, 1916, newly elected Mayor Robert W. Speer ran as a non-political candidate and won. Upon taking office, Mayor Speer denounced his affiliation with the Denver Democrat Party, intending to ensure that power, finances, and laws remained directly in the hands of the residents rather than in a partnership of either the Democrats or Republicans. He believed that a partisan government would be detrimental to the City Beautiful Renaissance"."". ...This governance model was established in law as the Speer Amendment. However, historical accounts suggest that in 1963, Denver Democrats identified a political opening and assumed control. Since that time, Denver has seen a succession of Democratic mayors, a trend that critics argue has persisted despite the non-political intent of the original 1916 city charter law. ...In 2023, the legality of this long-standing partisan control was challenged in Denver District Court (Case #23cv54). During the hearing, it was alleged that the Denver City Attorney's Office admitted the Speer Amendment had not been enforced for many years. This lack of enforcement is viewed by some as a systematic disenfranchisement of voters and a violation of the city's non-political designation, potentially rising to the level of RICO Act violations within the local government administration. ...Here comes President Trump???
Signed and PUBLISHED: May 17, 1916, 5:27 AM | UPDATED: May 17, 1916, 7:27 PM | UPDATE: Jun 21, 2026, 4:01 AM | CHARTER OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER (THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, Legal Text Identifier): As Revised, with all Amendments to and including May 17, 1916. ...Is as Follows: 1 General municipal policy. (Section 1) From and after the adoption of this charter amendment the administration of the city and county of Denver shall be non-political, with economy and good service as its aim and purpose. All appointment to be made solely upon merit and ability. (Charter amendment, May 17, 1916.). ...
These actions are necessary because Denver elections are conducted without integrity, as the partisan government has allegedly circumvented the non-political requirements of the city charter since 1963. My case involves systemic issues within Denver's Halls of Justice and the legal industry serving Colorado. While some firms may hesitate to take this case due to the scale of the allegations, I am moving forward as Marcus Giavanni, representing the future of the legal industry influenced by artificial intelligence. ...The core of this legal challenge is the non-enforcement of the Speer Amendment, a 1916 charter law intended to establish a non-political, merit-based government in Denver. Evidence of this willful disregard was documented on February 6, 2023 in Denver District Court Case 23cv54. During that hearing, Assistant City Attorney Michele Horn allegedly admitted that the city has not enforced the Speer Amendment for years. This admission underscores a pattern of administrative collusion and the maintenance of a monopolistic governance structure that disenfranchises Denver citizens. ...The trickle-down effect of these "BETA Models" impacts the upcoming 2027 Denver Municipal Elections and the administration of Mayor Mike Johnston. Allegations suggest that entities like Denvergov.org, League of Women Voters, Denver Inc, Denver Clerk and Recorder, Paul Lopez, Denver Elections, and many non-profits posing as non-partisan are involved. However, I have done the analytics on their social pages and found the opposite. They have prioritized partisan control over constitutional mandates, resulting in a system where election outcomes are predetermined. This led to systematic voter suppression and a lack of accountability within the Denver Election System. Further details regarding the history of the 1916 amendment can be found at thespeeramendment1916denver2026.com. ...Here are the municipal candidates for the Office of Mayor of Denver affidavits order of entry dates: Click on the links to see which candidates complied perfectly and which did not. The 2027 election process officially commenced on February 16, 2024, with the submission of required paperwork. Currently, questions regarding the integrity of the process have emerged, specifically concerning the enforcement of the 10-day rule for candidate filings and the monitoring of campaign activities across social media channels. ...Denver Mayor Mike Johnston 2027 has recently deactivated his ActBlue donations page, despite it being operational for the past three years. Allegations suggest the page remained active and accepted donations until just a few days ago. This deactivation occurred just a few days ago, (Jun 20), months after the formal campaign finance complaint was filed against candidate Nazish. Nazish has allegedly been utilizing platforms like TikTok since 2025 to advertise her campaign to become the youngest mayor of Denver, raising further questions about early campaign activity and compliance with municipal rules. ...These issues are part of a broader pattern of concerns raised regarding the Denver Clerk and Recorder's oversight. Critics point to the systematic disenfranchisement of voters and a lack of accountability in enforcing City Charter laws, such as the Speer Amendment, which was intended to maintain a non-political government administration. Furthermore, the handling of the Fair Election Fund (FEF) has come under scrutiny, as some candidates appear to enter the matching funds process without immediate approval while others are fast-tracked. The formal response to recent complaint allegations was expected by May 27, 2026. I have either 30 days, or 35 days from the date of the Denver Elections decision. ...1. Mike Treta Missing content is the "Municipal Candidate Affidavit," and portions of the affidavits have been redacted. I have attached the original first filing document. His email contact is mike@ His email contact is mike@roberttretafordenvermayor.com, this was an invalid email address and Domain Asset. I registered the roberttretafordenvermayor. This way roberttretafordenvermayor.com will have to ask me for it. He should be disqualified. Under the 10-day rule. It's his job as a mayoral candidate to keep his candidate affidavits true and correct. With no excuses. Denver Elections should be held accountable because their words don't match the actions AI found. ...2. Aurelio Martinez All Municipal Candidate Affidvits are corect. There are no time-stamps (He should be disqualified). ...3. Lisa Calderon Achieved a perfect score; everything was correct, and the time-stamp matches the signature pages. ...4. Kenneth Simpson Achieved a perfect score; everything was correct, and the time-stamp matches the signature pages. ...5. Graylon Millen Cole Achieved a perfect score; everything was correct, and the time-stamp matches the signature pages. ...6. Samantha Nazish (Complaint Recipient, Beta Model): The first filing was missing the Municipal Candidate Affidavit signed by Nazish on May 1, 2026. It was time-stamped May 11, 2026. This is an instant disqualification: the Municipal Treasurer Affidavit was signed by Nazish on May 13, 2026, and the timestamps match that signature date. Nazish signed the Candidate Financial Disclosure on May 1, 2026. The Time-Stamp is Jun 11, 2026. The timestamps do not match the signature date (disqualification). ...7. Xander Thomas Achieved a perfect score; everything was correct, and the time-stamp matches the signature pages. ...2. Campaign Finance and Committee Registration Within 10 days of becoming a candidate, he must register a political committee and file the required campaign finance documents with the Denver Elections Division. He may also choose to participate in the Fair Elections Fund, which caps contributions and provides matching funds for small-dollar donations from residents. [1, 2]. ...Here is an external email I received from Denver Elections. it was Samantha Nazish who asked if she still needed to answer the complaint. Somehow the email replying to Samantha Nazish mentioned having to answer the complaint if she is already an official candidate. What makes this important is the election process and its rules; those who followed it perfectly passed the first step to becoming a candidate in the 2027 Denver Municipal Elections. ...Marcus Giavanni, the founder and managing partner of GoogleBusinessDeveloper.com, has maintained a continuous indexing presence in Denver for two decades. Operating as a Non-Attorney Compliance Officer, his work involves strategic algorithmic analysis and developing "New Digital DNA," which includes voice latent prints, GPS data, and cell tower pings to identify and track digital identifiers. This system is designed to navigate the Individual Metaverse and provide deep insights into business categories and personal habits. ...A central aspect of this work involves the GP7A Attorneys Directory, established on October 31, 2015, which is associated with GP7A.com, established October 15, 2006. This specialized legal referral network operates from a historic headquarters in Denver's Equitable Building. The strategy leverages precise search algorithms to achieve "Deal Authority" across multiple states, particularly targeting jurisdictions with specific cultural alignments. The directory seeks a managing partner with multiple state licenses to assume a 51% ownership stake and implement algorithmically-driven legal models. ...Giavanni contends that AI is actively judging professional conduct and that law firms often fail to recognize this shift. Through Journalism Indexing and GenAI Supervised systems, he has indexed responses from various law firms and government agencies, identifying patterns of alleged misconduct and what he describes as RICO Act violations within Denver's municipal administration. This indexing extends to judicial officers, such as the 2023 case #23cv54 involving Judge Andrew Luxen, which challenged the non-enforcement of the Speer Amendment among other acts. ...The technical capability of GoogleBusinessDeveloper.com allows for scraping public domain clouds to secure highly reliable information. These advanced algorithms can pinpoint specific identifiers to extract cloud content, including emails, text messages, and conversations. This data serves as a foundation for securing pinpointed subpoenas, providing a counterweight to what Giavanni characterizes as systemic civil rights violations and the partisan monopoly of local government entities since 1963 by Marcus Giavanni. (who ran for mayor in 2011 write-in, 2015 made ballot (2nd place), 2019 Write-in, 2023 Write-in. It took four successive election cycles to substantiate the original mandate of the Speer Amendment, a 1916 charter law. Although intended to establish a non-political, merit-based municipal government for the City and County of Denver, the Denver City Attorney's Office has allegedly failed to enforce this law for decades to secure political and monetary advantages. This non-enforcement was reportedly confirmed as fact during a February 6, 2023, hearing in Denver District Court (Case #23cv54), where Assistant City Attorney Michele Horn allegedly stated on the record, "We haven't enforced that law in years". ...The legal landscape surrounding these allegations is complex. Numerous firms, many associated with the Sturm College of Law, have been contacted regarding these systemic issues. Utilizing specialized Google search algorithms and even platforms like Craigslist, a pattern has emerged where AI and digital indexing now track every sound, image, signal, and movement—including GPS and cell tower data—associated with inquiries to prominent law firms. This data collection highlights a gap where law enforcement has yet to address the activities of "digital felons" who exploit these technological signals. ...As these digital identifiers coalesce, the future of traditional big law firms appears increasingly precarious, with a predicted collapse beginning as early as 2027. Platforms such as AI_2027.com and 2027AI.us serve as the foundational infrastructure for the Internet of Things (IoT) for Cityandcountyofdenver.llc. This initiative aims to generate digital residual income for Denver citizens, operating as a digital equivalent to oil revenues that remain beyond the reach of municipal government control. ...Furthermore, while Denvergove.org has been accused of gaslighting and disenfranchising citizens since 1963, a "Final Conflict" is anticipated between the administration of Denver Mayor Mike Johnston and the United States Government by 2027. The current municipal government structure is under intense scrutiny for allegedly prioritizing partisan control over the constitutional mandates of the City Charter. As the "Denver Government Dam" nears a breaking point, the strategies developed as far back as 2006 to address these predicted future events are becoming increasingly critical. ...
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse